Higher Smoking (cigarettes) Predicts Moderately Higher Tiredness / Fatigue for Population
Contents

Variables

A
Smoking (Cigarettes) 50
A
Tiredness / Fatigue 1606

Categories

A
Causes of Illness 2289
A
Symptoms 13336

Actions

A
Join Study
A
Your Data

Tags

Low Confidence
Weak Effect Size
Positive Relationship
Population Study
cause image gauge image effect image
Participants reported a 17.8% average increase in Tiredness / Fatigue following above average Smoking (cigarettes).
Abstract

Abstract

Tiredness / Fatigue was generally 18.9% higher than average after 2 count of Smoking per 7 days.

Aggregated data from 1 study participants suggests with a LOW degree of confidence (p=0.203, 95% CI -0.536 to 1.302) that Smoking has a moderately positive predictive relationship (R=0.383) with Tiredness / Fatigue.

The highest quartile of Tiredness / Fatigue measurements were observed following an average 4 count Smoking per day.

The lowest quartile of Tiredness / Fatigue measurements were observed following an average 2.5 count of Smoking per day.

After an onset delay of 0 seconds, Tiredness / Fatigue is typically 6% lower than average over the 7 days following around 2.5 count Smoking.

Objective

Objective

The objective of this study is to determine the nature of the relationship (if any) between Smoking and Tiredness / Fatigue. Additionally, we attempt to determine the Smoking (cigarettes) values most likely to produce optimal Tiredness / Fatigue values.
Participant Instructions

Participant Instructions

Manual Recording Option

A Create a reminder for Smoking (Cigarettes) here and record it daily by enabling notifications or using A the reminder inbox here .


Manual Recording Option

A Create a reminder for Tiredness / Fatigue here and record it daily by enabling notifications or using A the reminder inbox here .

Design

Design

This study is based on data donated by 1 participants. Thus, the study design is equivalent to the aggregation of 1 separate n=1 observational natural experiments.

Data Analysis

Data Analysis

Smoking (Cigarettes) Pre-Processing

Smoking (Cigarettes) measurement values below 0 count were assumed erroneous and removed. No maximum allowed measurement value was defined for Smoking (Cigarettes). It was assumed that any gaps in Smoking (Cigarettes) data were unrecorded 0 count measurement values.

Tiredness / Fatigue Pre-Processing

Tiredness / Fatigue measurement values below 1 out of 5 were assumed erroneous and removed. Tiredness / Fatigue measurement values above 5 out of 5 were assumed erroneous and removed. No missing data filling value was defined for Tiredness / Fatigue so any gaps in data were just not analyzed instead of assuming zero values for those times.

Predictive Analytics

It was assumed that 0 seconds would pass before a change in Smoking (cigarettes) would produce an observable change in Tiredness / Fatigue.

It was assumed that Smoking (cigarettes) could produce an observable change in Tiredness / Fatigue for as much as 7 days after the stimulus event.

Statistical Significance

Statistical Significance

Using a two-tailed t-test with alpha = 0.05, it was determined that the change in Tiredness / Fatigue is not statistically significant at a 95% confidence interval. This suggests that the Smoking value does not have a significant influence on the Tiredness / Fatigue value.

After treatment, a 17.8% increase (0.583 out of 5) from the mean baseline 3.08 out of 5 was observed. The relative standard deviation at baseline was 29.8%. The observed change was 0.63584 times the standard deviation.

A common rule of thumb considers a change greater than twice the baseline standard deviation on two separate pre-post experiments may be considered significant. This occurrence would have only a 5% likelihood of resulting from random fluctuation (a p-value < 0.05).

Data Sources

Data Sources

Smoking (cigarettes) data was primarily collected using QuantiModo. QuantiModo allows you to easily track mood, symptoms, or any outcome you want to optimize in a fraction of a second. You can also import your data from over 30 other apps and devices. QuantiModo then analyzes your data to identify which hidden factors are most likely to be influencing your mood or symptoms.

Tiredness / Fatigue data was primarily collected using QuantiModo. QuantiModo allows you to easily track mood, symptoms, or any outcome you want to optimize in a fraction of a second. You can also import your data from over 30 other apps and devices. QuantiModo then analyzes your data to identify which hidden factors are most likely to be influencing your mood or symptoms.

Limitations

Limitations

As with any human experiment, it was impossible to control for all potentially confounding variables. Correlation does not necessarily imply causation. We can never know for sure if one factor is definitely the cause of an outcome. However, lack of correlation definitely implies the lack of a causal relationship. Hence, we can with great confidence rule out non-existent relationships. For instance, if we discover no relationship between mood and an antidepressant this information is just as or even more valuable than the discovery that there is a relationship.

We can also take advantage of several characteristics of time series data from many subjects to infer the likelihood of a causal relationship if we do find a correlational relationship. The criteria for causation are a group of minimal conditions necessary to provide adequate evidence of a causal relationship between an incidence and a possible consequence.

Criteria For Causal Inference

Strength (A.K.A. Effect Size)

A small association does not mean that there is not a causal effect, though the larger the association, the more likely that it is causal. There is a moderately positive (R = 0.383) relationship between Smoking (cigarettes) and Tiredness / Fatigue.

Consistency (A.K.A. Reproducibility)

Consistent findings observed by different persons in different places with different samples strengthens the likelihood of an effect. Furthermore, in accordance with the law of large numbers (LLN), the predictive power and accuracy of these results will continually grow over time. 9 paired data points were used in this analysis. Assuming that the relationship is merely coincidental, as the participant independently modifies their Smoking (cigarettes) values, the observed strength of the relationship will decline until it is below the threshold of significance. To it another way, in the case that we do find a spurious correlation, suggesting that banana intake improves mood for instance, one will likely increase their banana intake. Due to the fact that this correlation is spurious, it is unlikely that you will see a continued and persistent corresponding increase in mood. So over time, the spurious correlation will naturally dissipate.

Specificity

Causation is likely if a very specific population at a specific site and disease with no other likely explanation. The more specific an association between a factor and an effect is, the bigger the probability of a causal relationship.

Temporality

The effect has to occur after the cause (and if there is an expected delay between the cause and expected effect, then the effect must occur after that delay). The confidence in a causal relationship is bolstered by the fact that time-precedence was taken into account in all calculations.

Biological Gradient

Greater exposure should generally lead to greater incidence of the effect. However, in some cases, the mere presence of the factor can trigger the effect. In other cases, an inverse proportion is observed: greater exposure leads to lower incidence.

Plausibility

A plausible bio-chemical mechanism between cause and effect is critical. This is where human brains excel.

Based on our responses so far,

0 humans feel that there is a plausible mechanism of action for a relationship between Smoking (cigarettes) and Tiredness / Fatigue.

0 humans feel that any relationship observed between Smoking (cigarettes) and Tiredness / Fatigue is coincidental.

Coherence

Coherence between epidemiological and laboratory findings increases the likelihood of an effect. It will be very enlightening to aggregate this data with the data from other participants with similar genetic, diseasomic, environmentomic, and demographic profiles.

Experiment

All of human life can be considered a natural experiment. Occasionally, it is possible to appeal to experimental evidence.

Analogy

The effect of similar factors may be considered.

Plausibility

Plausibility

A plausible bio-chemical mechanism between cause and effect is critical. This is where human brains excel. Based on our responses so far, 0 humans feel that there is a plausible mechanism of action and 0 feel that any relationship observed between Smoking (cigarettes) and Tiredness / Fatigue is coincidental.

Relationship Statistics

Property Value
Cause Variable Name Smoking (cigarettes)
Effect Variable Name Tiredness / Fatigue
Sinn Predictive Coefficient 0.036447267598981
Confidence Level LOW
Confidence Interval 0.91904
Forward Pearson Predictive Coefficient 0.383
Critical T Value 1.833
Total Smoking (cigarettes) Over Previous 7 days Before ABOVE Average Tiredness / Fatigue 4 count
Total Smoking (cigarettes) Over Previous 7 days Before BELOW Average Tiredness / Fatigue 2.5 count
Duration of Action 7 days
Effect Size moderately positive
Number of Paired Measurements 9
Optimal Pearson Product 0.16941080762198
P Value 0.20276
Statistical Significance 0.0047
Strength of Relationship 0.91904
Study Type population
Analysis Performed At 2021-08-30
Number of Participants 1

Smoking (Cigarettes) Info

Property Value
Variable Name Smoking (cigarettes)
Aggregation Method SUM
Analysis Performed At 2020-10-09
Duration of Action 7 days
Filling Value 0
Kurtosis 4.721025095074
Mean 1.20895 count
Median 0.33333333333333 count
Minimum Allowed Value 0 count
Number of Aggregate Predictors 0
Number of Aggregate Outcomes 50
Number of Measurements 181
Number of Measurements (including those generated by tagged, joined, or child variables) 181
Public true
Onset Delay 0 seconds
Standard Deviation 1.406912336766
Unit Count
User Variables 4
Variable Category Causes of Illness
Variable ID 98025
Variance 4.0351855351855

Tiredness / Fatigue Info

Property Value
Variable Name Tiredness / Fatigue
Aggregation Method MEAN
Analysis Performed At 2022-08-24
Duration of Action 24 hours
Kurtosis 1.6919668468584
Maximum Allowed Value 5 out of 5
Mean 3.3804466501241 out of 5
Median 3.3840182382134 out of 5
Minimum Allowed Value 1 out of 5
Number of Aggregate Predictors 1322
Number of Aggregate Outcomes 284
Number of Measurements 8649
Number of Measurements (including those generated by tagged, joined, or child variables) 8649
Public true
Onset Delay 0 seconds
Standard Deviation 0.35915630620121
Unit 1 to 5 Rating
User Variables 1231
UPC 635797687433
Variable Category Symptoms
Variable ID 87760
Variance 0.38608734381768

Principal Investigator

Cite This Study

APA Format
Sinn, M. P. (2026). Higher Smoking (cigarettes) Predicts Moderately Higher Tiredness / Fatigue for Population. The Journal of Citizen Science. https://studies.crowdsourcingcures.org/study/cause-98025-effect-87760-population-study
BibTeX
@misc{sinn_cause_98025_effect_87760_population_study_2026,
  author = {Sinn, Mike P.},
  title = {Higher Smoking (cigarettes) Predicts Moderately Higher Tiredness / Fatigue for Population},
  year = {2026},
  publisher = {The Journal of Citizen Science},
  url = {https://studies.crowdsourcingcures.org/study/cause-98025-effect-87760-population-study},
  note = {Accessed: January 3, 2026}
}
Chicago/Turabian
Sinn, Mike P. "Higher Smoking (cigarettes) Predicts Moderately Higher Tiredness / Fatigue for Population." The Journal of Citizen Science. Accessed January 3, 2026. https://studies.crowdsourcingcures.org/study/cause-98025-effect-87760-population-study.