Higher Memory Score From Lumosity Predicts Slightly Higher Facebook Pages Liked for Population
Contents
Mike Sinn
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mike Sinn

Variables

A
Memory Score From Lumosity 53
A
Facebook Pages Liked 916

Categories

A
Cognitive Performance 19
A
Social Interactions 78

Actions

A
Join Study
A
Your Data

Tags

Low Confidence
Weak Effect Size
Positive Relationship
Population Study
cause image gauge image effect image
Participants reported a 132.4% average increase in Facebook Pages Liked following above average Memory Score From Lumosity.
Abstract

Abstract

Facebook Pages Liked was generally 150% higher than average after an average of 755 index of Memory Score From Lumosity over the previous 24 hours.

Aggregated data from 2 study participants suggests with a LOW degree of confidence (p=0.138, 95% CI 0.163 to 0.418) that Memory Score From Lumosity has a weakly positive predictive relationship (R=0.29) with Facebook Pages Liked.

The highest quartile of Facebook Pages Liked measurements were observed following an average 1 index Memory Score From Lumosity.

The lowest quartile of Facebook Pages Liked measurements were observed following an average 1090 index of Memory Score From Lumosity.

After an onset delay of 0 seconds, Facebook Pages Liked is typically 100% lower than average over the 24 hours following around 1090 index Memory Score From Lumosity.

Objective

Objective

The objective of this study is to determine the nature of the relationship (if any) between Memory Score From Lumosity and Facebook Pages Liked. Additionally, we attempt to determine the Memory Score From Lumosity values most likely to produce optimal Facebook Pages Liked values.
Participant Instructions

Participant Instructions

Manual Recording Option

A Create a reminder for Memory Score From Lumosity here and record it daily by enabling notifications or using A the reminder inbox here .


Manual Recording Option

A Create a reminder for Facebook Pages Liked here and record it daily by enabling notifications or using A the reminder inbox here .

Design

Design

This study is based on data donated by 2 participants. Thus, the study design is equivalent to the aggregation of 2 separate n=1 observational natural experiments.

Data Analysis

Data Analysis

Memory Score From Lumosity Pre-Processing

Memory Score From Lumosity measurement values below 0 index were assumed erroneous and removed. No maximum allowed measurement value was defined for Memory Score From Lumosity. No missing data filling value was defined for Memory Score From Lumosity so any gaps in data were just not analyzed instead of assuming zero values for those times.

Facebook Pages Liked Pre-Processing

Facebook Pages Liked measurement values below 0 event were assumed erroneous and removed. No maximum allowed measurement value was defined for Facebook Pages Liked. It was assumed that any gaps in Facebook Pages Liked data were unrecorded 0 event measurement values.

Predictive Analytics

It was assumed that 0 seconds would pass before a change in Memory Score From Lumosity would produce an observable change in Facebook Pages Liked.

It was assumed that Memory Score From Lumosity could produce an observable change in Facebook Pages Liked for as much as 24 hours after the stimulus event.

Statistical Significance

Statistical Significance

Using a two-tailed t-test with alpha = 0.05, it was determined that the change in Facebook Pages Liked is not statistically significant at a 95% confidence interval. This suggests that the Memory Score From Lumosity value does not have a significant influence on the Facebook Pages Liked value.

After treatment, a 132% increase (0.0667 event) from the mean baseline 0 event was observed. The relative standard deviation at baseline was 0.4%. The observed change was 0.15757 times the standard deviation.

A common rule of thumb considers a change greater than twice the baseline standard deviation on two separate pre-post experiments may be considered significant. This occurrence would have only a 5% likelihood of resulting from random fluctuation (a p-value < 0.05).

Data Sources

Data Sources

Memory Score From Lumosity data was primarily collected using QuantiModo. QuantiModo allows you to easily track mood, symptoms, or any outcome you want to optimize in a fraction of a second. You can also import your data from over 30 other apps and devices. QuantiModo then analyzes your data to identify which hidden factors are most likely to be influencing your mood or symptoms.

Facebook Pages Liked data was primarily collected using QuantiModo. QuantiModo allows you to easily track mood, symptoms, or any outcome you want to optimize in a fraction of a second. You can also import your data from over 30 other apps and devices. QuantiModo then analyzes your data to identify which hidden factors are most likely to be influencing your mood or symptoms.

Limitations

Limitations

As with any human experiment, it was impossible to control for all potentially confounding variables. Correlation does not necessarily imply causation. We can never know for sure if one factor is definitely the cause of an outcome. However, lack of correlation definitely implies the lack of a causal relationship. Hence, we can with great confidence rule out non-existent relationships. For instance, if we discover no relationship between mood and an antidepressant this information is just as or even more valuable than the discovery that there is a relationship.

We can also take advantage of several characteristics of time series data from many subjects to infer the likelihood of a causal relationship if we do find a correlational relationship. The criteria for causation are a group of minimal conditions necessary to provide adequate evidence of a causal relationship between an incidence and a possible consequence.

Criteria For Causal Inference

Strength (A.K.A. Effect Size)

A small association does not mean that there is not a causal effect, though the larger the association, the more likely that it is causal. There is a weakly positive (R = 0.2903) relationship between Memory Score From Lumosity and Facebook Pages Liked.

Consistency (A.K.A. Reproducibility)

Consistent findings observed by different persons in different places with different samples strengthens the likelihood of an effect. Furthermore, in accordance with the law of large numbers (LLN), the predictive power and accuracy of these results will continually grow over time. 45 paired data points were used in this analysis. Assuming that the relationship is merely coincidental, as the participant independently modifies their Memory Score From Lumosity values, the observed strength of the relationship will decline until it is below the threshold of significance. To it another way, in the case that we do find a spurious correlation, suggesting that banana intake improves mood for instance, one will likely increase their banana intake. Due to the fact that this correlation is spurious, it is unlikely that you will see a continued and persistent corresponding increase in mood. So over time, the spurious correlation will naturally dissipate.

Specificity

Causation is likely if a very specific population at a specific site and disease with no other likely explanation. The more specific an association between a factor and an effect is, the bigger the probability of a causal relationship.

Temporality

The effect has to occur after the cause (and if there is an expected delay between the cause and expected effect, then the effect must occur after that delay). The confidence in a causal relationship is bolstered by the fact that time-precedence was taken into account in all calculations.

Biological Gradient

Greater exposure should generally lead to greater incidence of the effect. However, in some cases, the mere presence of the factor can trigger the effect. In other cases, an inverse proportion is observed: greater exposure leads to lower incidence.

Plausibility

A plausible bio-chemical mechanism between cause and effect is critical. This is where human brains excel.

Based on our responses so far,

0 humans feel that there is a plausible mechanism of action for a relationship between Memory Score From Lumosity and Facebook Pages Liked.

0 humans feel that any relationship observed between Memory Score From Lumosity and Facebook Pages Liked is coincidental.

Coherence

Coherence between epidemiological and laboratory findings increases the likelihood of an effect. It will be very enlightening to aggregate this data with the data from other participants with similar genetic, diseasomic, environmentomic, and demographic profiles.

Experiment

All of human life can be considered a natural experiment. Occasionally, it is possible to appeal to experimental evidence.

Analogy

The effect of similar factors may be considered.

Plausibility

Plausibility

A plausible bio-chemical mechanism between cause and effect is critical. This is where human brains excel. Based on our responses so far, 0 humans feel that there is a plausible mechanism of action and 0 feel that any relationship observed between Memory Score From Lumosity and Facebook Pages Liked is coincidental.

Relationship Statistics

Property Value
Cause Variable Name Memory Score From Lumosity
Effect Variable Name Facebook Pages Liked
Sinn Predictive Coefficient 0.026311232245249
Confidence Level LOW
Confidence Interval 0.12775
Forward Pearson Predictive Coefficient 0.2903
Critical T Value 1.676
Average Memory Score From Lumosity Over Previous 24 hours Before ABOVE Average Facebook Pages Liked 1 index
Average Memory Score From Lumosity Over Previous 24 hours Before BELOW Average Facebook Pages Liked 1090 index
Duration of Action 24 hours
Effect Size weakly positive
Number of Paired Measurements 45
Optimal Pearson Product 0.18774419515608
P Value 0.13787
Statistical Significance 0.4444
Strength of Relationship 0.12775
Study Type population
Analysis Performed At 2021-08-30
Number of Participants 2

Memory Score From Lumosity Info

Property Value
Variable Name Memory Score From Lumosity
Aggregation Method MEAN
Analysis Performed At 2020-09-15
Duration of Action 24 hours
Kurtosis 3.6409569883467
Mean 1096.5888888889 index
Median 1131 index
Minimum Allowed Value 0 index
Number of Aggregate Predictors 43
Number of Aggregate Outcomes 10
Number of Measurements 90
Number of Measurements (including those generated by tagged, joined, or child variables) 45
Public true
Onset Delay 0 seconds
Standard Deviation 118.00779806454
Unit Index
User Variables 2
UPC 0
Variable Category Cognitive Performance
Variable ID 1374
Variance 13925.84040404

Facebook Pages Liked Info

Property Value
Variable Name Facebook Pages Liked
Aggregation Method SUM
Analysis Performed At 2020-10-11
Duration of Action 7 days
Filling Value 0
Kurtosis 273.83865391441
Mean 0.27514379698492 event
Median 0.020100502512563 event
Minimum Allowed Value 0 event
Number of Aggregate Predictors 732
Number of Aggregate Outcomes 184
Number of Measurements 164257
Number of Measurements (including those generated by tagged, joined, or child variables) 151770
Public true
Onset Delay 0 seconds
Standard Deviation 1.0850111721454
Unit Event
User Variables 461
UPC 0
Variable Category Social Interactions
Variable ID 5969791
Variance 3.5942247713855